2 New Media Interviews!

A federal district court has delayed the new National Labor Relations Board rule on joint employers, the second time the start date has been pushed back.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce asked the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas to block the rule. The court held a hearing on that motion Feb. 13, and said it will issue an opinion soon.

For now, the way the NLRB determines if companies are joint employers will go into effect March 11, instead of Feb. 26.

Should general contractors find themselves deemed a joint employer of a subcontractors’ employee, they could face potential litigation or other consequences for workplace violations sustained by workers. Two entities are considered joint employers when they determine together the essential terms of a workers’ employment. With multiple subcontractors on construction projects, there’s a real chance for GCs to be considered joint employers for workers on the job they don’t directly employ.

The new standard would rescind a 2020, Trump-era rule, which made it easier for “actual joint employers to avoid a finding of joint-employer status” due to a higher threshold on terms of employment, according to the NLRB.

The change in many ways reverts to a 2015 version of the rule, but employer groups have lamented that this week’s change — first announced in October — lacks clarity, potentially exposing them to litigation.

“It creates a more vague rule about when two parties could end up as joint employers,” said Dan Rosenberg, principal attorney at Chicago-based Much Shelist. “Especially in construction where there are so many parties on one site working together, especially GCs or prime trade contractors that have a lot of other trades under them. It leaves them potentially legally exposed to claims from the employees.”

General contractors should beef up their contracts in preparation for the new rule in order to limit the responsibility they have for subcontractors’ employees. Firms can plan ahead by using careful contract language and communicating clearly with project leaders to ensure they don’t find themselves liable when they don’t have control over an employee’s work.

The new conditions of employment

The NLRB’s new standard for joint employment considers seven factors to determine whether a worker is an employee of a company, only one of which needs to be true. They are whether the company in question is responsible for:

• Wages, benefits and other compensation.
• Hours of work and scheduling.
• The assignment of work.
• The supervision of work.
• Work rules and directions on the manner and methods of work and the grounds for discipline.
• The hiring and discharging of workers.
• Working conditions related to safety and health.

Outlining responsibilities

Defining roles and expectations for GCs and subs during the contract phase can help protect builders early on, Rosenberg said. Specifically, outlining the roles of subcontractors and noting their responsibility for the seven factors of their workers on the jobsite can help build that defense.

“There is language that you could add in the contract, that as the GC you’re not responsible for and don’t have control over the hours, wages, the assignment of duties — these seven factors. Put that in the subcontract and also put in there that there’s no intent of the parties that they’ll be a joint employer,” he said. “Make the courts have to look at the contract and basically decide that they’re going to disregard some language where you make clear that that wasn’t the intent.”

Contractors should have all responsibilities “to the greatest extent possible clearly delineated,” said Charles A. Krugel, a human resources attorney and counselor based in Chicago, adding they should have everything about command and control as clear as possible in documentation with subs.

Nonetheless, it’s not as though there is language that could provide an escape clause skirting the NLRB’s rule when one of the seven factors is met, Krugel said.

Walk the talk

As with any other element of a contract, parties must follow through on the duties they agree to perform, or not perform.

“You have to talk the talk and walk the walk,” Krugel said.

To ensure that’s the case, GCs should talk with project stakeholders, such as project leaders, on the dos and don’ts under the new rule.

“I would say that the biggest thing you want to do is provide general direction to your subs and try not to control particular employees,” Rosenberg said.

That could mean directing the GC’s superintendents to not oversee the scheduling, work or safety conditions of a worker employed by a subcontractor. Rosenberg and Krugel both noted this as a critique of the NLRB rule change; it could disincentivize contractors and superintendents from acting to help protect the health and safety of a worker employed by a sub.