<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avvo &#038; Their Defective Lawyer Rating System Biased Against Solos &#038; Small Firms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.charlesakrugel.com/professional-service-firm/avvo-their-defective-lawyer-rating-system.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.charlesakrugel.com/professional-service-firm/avvo-their-defective-lawyer-rating-system.html</link>
	<description>Labor &#38; Employment Law, Human Resources Law</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: charlesakrugel</title>
		<link>http://www.charlesakrugel.com/professional-service-firm/avvo-their-defective-lawyer-rating-system.html/comment-page-1#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>charlesakrugel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesakrugel.com/?p=145#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment Joe. 

I'm actually in favor on online ranking/evaluation systems, especially if they're free.  But you're right about Avvo's "claiming" system being a scam.  I more or less said the same thing in my post.  I contacted Avvo's CS to try to "unclaim" my profile, but they refused.  Avvo's deficiencies is one of the reasons I started posting "Client Testimonials" on my site.

Sincerely,

Chuck Krugel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment Joe. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m actually in favor on online ranking/evaluation systems, especially if they&#8217;re free.  But you&#8217;re right about Avvo&#8217;s &#8220;claiming&#8221; system being a scam.  I more or less said the same thing in my post.  I contacted Avvo&#8217;s CS to try to &#8220;unclaim&#8221; my profile, but they refused.  Avvo&#8217;s deficiencies is one of the reasons I started posting &#8220;Client Testimonials&#8221; on my site.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Chuck Krugel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.charlesakrugel.com/professional-service-firm/avvo-their-defective-lawyer-rating-system.html/comment-page-1#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesakrugel.com/?p=145#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Although the lawyer ratings can be useful, avvo.com is not.  

Martindale Hubbell has for years published credible attorney rankings.  Its methodology is transparent and credible, and its rating are avallable for free at www.martindale.com.

Avvo appears to be a scam which deflates a lawyer's ranking unless he or she "claims" his or her profile (and provide personal information, and a credit card),</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the lawyer ratings can be useful, avvo.com is not.  </p>
<p>Martindale Hubbell has for years published credible attorney rankings.  Its methodology is transparent and credible, and its rating are avallable for free at <a href="http://www.martindale.com" rel="nofollow" class="extlink" target="_blank">http://www.martindale.com</a>.</p>
<p>Avvo appears to be a scam which deflates a lawyer&#8217;s ranking unless he or she &#8220;claims&#8221; his or her profile (and provide personal information, and a credit card),</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://www.charlesakrugel.com/professional-service-firm/avvo-their-defective-lawyer-rating-system.html/comment-page-1#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 18:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesakrugel.com/?p=145#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Avvo's rating system maybe biased, however I have to give them their piece for getting the attention they need to grow.  They're slowly growing and it's partly to us giving them this type of attention.  Anyway from a growth perspective, they've got many lawyers and this means they'll probably be more exposed than other websites.  

As we're in the law topic, the other day I ran into another new kid in the block named lawyerahead (www.lawyerahead.com).  Not sure how their internal system works but their concept is about "Present your case. Find the right lawyer".  Users can either present their case only to lawyers or publicly, where others can read their case and give input.  It seems to be working by the number of cases in the system.  It seems like they started late last year.  I don't think Avvo and Lawyerahead are competing, since the models seems to be completely different.  

In the end it's about the customer.  What is the user going to feel, whose going to have the most value.  Anyway I have to give some kudos to lawyerahead.  Fresh idea and potentially a new way of looking at how legal services can be provided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Avvo&#8217;s rating system maybe biased, however I have to give them their piece for getting the attention they need to grow.  They&#8217;re slowly growing and it&#8217;s partly to us giving them this type of attention.  Anyway from a growth perspective, they&#8217;ve got many lawyers and this means they&#8217;ll probably be more exposed than other websites.  </p>
<p>As we&#8217;re in the law topic, the other day I ran into another new kid in the block named lawyerahead (www.lawyerahead.com).  Not sure how their internal system works but their concept is about &#8220;Present your case. Find the right lawyer&#8221;.  Users can either present their case only to lawyers or publicly, where others can read their case and give input.  It seems to be working by the number of cases in the system.  It seems like they started late last year.  I don&#8217;t think Avvo and Lawyerahead are competing, since the models seems to be completely different.  </p>
<p>In the end it&#8217;s about the customer.  What is the user going to feel, whose going to have the most value.  Anyway I have to give some kudos to lawyerahead.  Fresh idea and potentially a new way of looking at how legal services can be provided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.charlesakrugel.com/professional-service-firm/avvo-their-defective-lawyer-rating-system.html/comment-page-1#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesakrugel.com/?p=145#comment-97</guid>
		<description>I am really enjoying your posts "labor and employment" .. thanks very much for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really enjoying your posts &#8220;labor and employment&#8221; .. thanks very much for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Avvo &#38; Their Defective Lawyer Rating System</title>
		<link>http://www.charlesakrugel.com/professional-service-firm/avvo-their-defective-lawyer-rating-system.html/comment-page-1#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>A &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Avvo &#38; Their Defective Lawyer Rating System</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesakrugel.com/?p=145#comment-94</guid>
		<description>[...] Avvo &#38; Their Defective Lawyer Rating System  After reading a recent Chicago Tribune article regarding Avvo’s (www.Avvo.com) online lawyer rating system, I decided to check out the site for myself. At first glance, the site looks interesting, useful and credible.  The same as many other online consumer, ratings, networking and other business related sites.  I enjoy these sites, use them and believe that they have valuable things to offer.  However, as I delved deeper into Avvo’s rating system, I discovered substantial issues and came to t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Avvo &amp; Their Defective Lawyer Rating System  After reading a recent Chicago Tribune article regarding Avvo’s (www.Avvo.com) online lawyer rating system, I decided to check out the site for myself. At first glance, the site looks interesting, useful and credible.  The same as many other online consumer, ratings, networking and other business related sites.  I enjoy these sites, use them and believe that they have valuable things to offer.  However, as I delved deeper into Avvo’s rating system, I discovered substantial issues and came to t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
