<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Charles A. Krugel &#187; Benefit Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.charlesakrugel.com/category/benefit-plan/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.charlesakrugel.com</link>
	<description>Labor &#38; Employment Law, Human Resources Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 23:49:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2008 Projected Employer Health Care Costs</title>
		<link>http://www.charlesakrugel.com/business-management/2008-projected-employer-health-care-costs.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.charlesakrugel.com/business-management/2008-projected-employer-health-care-costs.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 00:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>charlesakrugel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefit Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wellness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesakrugel.com/business-management/2008-projected-employer-health-care-costs.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Shaheen, my associate from The Horton Group, an employer benefits brokerage and consultancy, sent me their latest LegalEase newsletter today. It&#8217;s worth posting because it&#8217;s an in-depth and fascinating article concerning projected employer health care costs for 2008. 2008 Per-Employee Health Care Costs To Exceed $9,300; Wide Disparities Foreseen By Stephen Miller, October 2007 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><span class="extlink">Paul Shaheen</span>, my associate from <a href="http://www.thehortongroup.com"title="The Horton Group"  class="extlink" target="_blank">The Horton Group</a>, an employer benefits brokerage and consultancy, sent me their latest LegalEase newsletter today.  It&#8217;s worth posting because it&#8217;s an in-depth and fascinating article concerning projected employer health care costs for 2008.</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">2008 Per-Employee Health Care Costs To Exceed $9,300; Wide Disparities Foreseen</span></strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial"> </span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">By Stephen Miller</span></strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">, <em>October 2007</em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">[From SHRM Online's <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Compensation &amp; Benefits Focus Area</span></strong>]</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">The average corporate health benefit expenditure in 2008 will be $9,312 per employee &#8220;an increase of 7 percent over 2007&#8243; with annual per-employee contributions exceeding $2,000, according to Towers Perrin&#8217;s 2008 <em>Health Care Cost Survey</em>.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">But while the cost trend is broadly holding steady, there are significant cost differences for companies that are actively and effectively managing program performance<em>.</em> <strong>Those &#8220;high-performing companies&#8221; will see annual per-employee costs of about $1,500 less than low performers in 2008, or nearly a 20 percent differential, according to the firm&#8217;s analysis.</strong></span></p>
<p><strong><em><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #993366">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</span></em></strong><strong><em><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: purple"><br />
&#8216;High-performers&#8217; will see per-employee health costs<br />
nearly 20 percent lower than &#8216;low-performers.&#8217;</span></em></strong><strong><em><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #993366"><br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</span></em></strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial"> </span></p>
<p><span id="more-104"></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">The survey database includes information on the health benefit programs provided by more than 300 of the nation&#8217;s largest employers, covering nearly 6 million U.S. employees, retirees and dependents.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">&#8220;The good news is that, for the first time in over a decade, we are seeing a number of companies keeping cost growth near the Consumer Price Index for medical services (medical CPI), which currently stands at about 4 percent,&#8221; said Dave Guilmette, managing director of the Towers Perrin health and welfare practice. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">In flat dollar terms, 2008 gross health care expenditures are expected to rise by an average of $577 per employee, to an average total cost of $9,312. Employers are expecting to subsidize 78 percent of next year&#8217;s premium costs, and employees will have to cover the remaining 22 percent, plus usage-based co-pays, deductibles and co-insurance. </span></p>
<table class="MsoNormalTable" style="margin-left: 27pt" border="1" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr style="height: 85.35pt;">
<td style="padding: 0.75pt; background: #ffff99 none repeat scroll 0% 50%; width: 249pt; height: 85.35pt;" width="332" valign="top"><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: maroon">Other   Surveys Project:</span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><br />
The 2008 <strong><em><span style="color: blue">Segal Health Plan Cost Trend Survey</span></em></strong> foresees the health cost trend for U.S. point-of-service medical   plans (for actives and retirees under 65) decelerating to a <strong>10.5 percent</strong> rise for 2008.</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Meanwhile, <strong>PricewaterhouseCoopers anticipates</strong> the following   average increases in 2008 medical costs:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: #003366"> </span></strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Preferred provider organizations (PPOs), health maintenance   organizations (HMOs), point-of-service plans (POSs) and exclusive-provider   organizations (EPOs): <strong>9.9 percent.<span style="color: #003366"> </span></strong></span></li>
</ul>
<p><strong> *</strong>Consumer-directed health plans, including health savings   accounts (HSAs) and health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs): <strong>7.4 percent.</strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">While Towers Perrin foresees the employer-employee premium cost share remaining the same as the 2007 split, the accelerated increase in the actual employee contribution &#8220;combined with decreasing benefit values&#8221; means that the 22 percent employee share actually buys less coverage than in past years. For example, the incremental out-of-pocket cost employees will assume in 2008 because of plan design changes is approximately $200.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">Employee contributions, on average, will jump by $156 per employee per year to $2,040, an 8 percent increase that is roughly twice that of annual employee merit increases. The combined effect is that over the past five years, out-of-pocket costs for employees have essentially doubled, a clear indication of how pronounced the affordability issue remains, particularly for low-wage workers.</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">Coverage Levels</span></strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial"> <strong>Breakdown</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">Analyzing the data by coverage level, the average reported 2008 cost of medical coverage will be:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #003366">For active-employee-only coverage:</span></strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial"> $4,704 per year ($392 monthly).<strong> </strong></span></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>For employee-plus-one-dependent coverage:</strong> $9,660 per year ($805 monthly).<strong> </strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>For family coverage:</strong> $13,704 per year ($1,142 monthly).</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">The total cost for retirees under age 65 is the highest in the survey, at $569 per month for retiree-only coverage ($6,828 annually), and more for coverage that includes dependents.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">Employers continue to shoulder most of the burden. Of the total 2008 premium increase of $577:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #000000;"><strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #003366">Employers will pay</span></strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">, on average, $421 more per employee.<strong></strong></span></span></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Employees will pay</strong>, on average, $156 more.</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">In addition to premiums, active employees and their dependents can expect a co-pay of about $20 for regular doctor office visits and a $30 co-pay for specialist visits.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">Under plans with co-insurance, employees will pay about 35 percent of the cost of an office visit. Active employees and their dependents will pay, on average, $10 for generic prescriptions and $25 for brand-name prescriptions in 2008.</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">Active Management Matters</span></strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">Among positive news for employers and employees, the survey shows that, for 2008, a number of companies have succeeded in keeping a tight rein on the cost of their own programs and, as such, are helping to keep the overall rate of increase dramatically lower than the double-digit jumps experienced four to eight years ago. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">Many companies, however, remain unclear on how to balance health care cost pressures with workforce goals and continue to experience cost increases more characteristic of the late 1990s. The result is wide variation in employer and employee cost burdens among similarly sized companies. For example, the 2008 data show that nearly a quarter of companies (22 percent) are still experiencing increases of 11 percent or more.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">To better understand the factors that contribute to cost variation for the past three years, Towers Perrin divided respondents in its annual health care cost database into three categories: low-performing, average-performing and high-performing companies. Performance designations are based on relative costs and cost increases, as well as whether an organization is meeting its health benefit objectives in such areas as efficient purchasing, employee engagement and managing health risks in the employee population.</span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">The Art of the Possible</span></strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial"> </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">While nearly a quarter of the survey respondents continue to struggle with double-digit cost increases, nearly half of the high performers are managing to get their increases much closer to the medical CPI of about 4 percent. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">Among high performers, 45 percent have cost increases of 5 percent or less evidence, in Towers Perrin&#8217;s view, that active management of program performance is an exercise in the &#8220;art of the possible,&#8221; and an increasingly urgent mandate for companies still experiencing double-digit growth rates. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">High-performing companies aren&#8217;t simply shifting costs to their employees to keep their costs low but rather are employing a broad range of tactics and strategies to hold the line on costs for both the company and employees. In fact, employees at high-performing companies will pay significantly less than employees at low-performing companies &#8220;approximately $1,836 per year (on average) vs. the $2,256 employees at low-performing companies will pay in 2008, according to the survey report. </span></p>
<table class="MsoNormalTable" style="margin-left: 27pt" border="1" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 0.75pt; background: #ffff99 none repeat scroll 0% 50%; width: 255pt;" width="340" valign="top"><strong><em><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: black">Best   Practices Lead to Lower Costs<br />
&#8220;High performers&#8221; show a deep commitment to managing their programs   in ways that benefit the company and employees, the survey report found. They&#8217;re   also characterized by:</span></em></strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong><em><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: black">A clear focus on and commitment to supporting employees&#8217;   health and health care decisions.</span></em></strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong><em>Well-articulated strategies and rigorous metrics for evaluating program   effectiveness.</em></strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong><em>Critical program performance factors in place.</em></strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong><em>Benefit designs that encourage transparency and accountability.</em></strong></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong><em>Rigorous and effective communication and decision support programs that   successfully engage employees and help build a culture of health in the   organization.</em></strong></li>
</ul>
<p><strong><em><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: black">These   attributes express themselves in the following practices:</span></em></strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.5in"><strong><em><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: black">Commitment to employees. High-performing companies are   highly committed to employees, supporting employees&#8217; ability to make sound   health care decisions, taking steps to motivate employees to manage their health   care purchases responsibly, and working to manage health risks and conditions   in the employee population overall. </span></em></strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.5in"><strong><em><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: black">Managing by measuring. High performers are far more   rigorous than low performers in developing and documenting their health care   strategies. They manage by fact. For example, the vast majority of   high-performing companies conduct extensive measurement of program costs vs.   less than half of the low-performing group. </span></em></strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.5in"><strong><em><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: black">Ensuring critical success factors are in place. While   the 2008 data show that all companies are doing more than ever to ensure that   critical success factors &#8220;such as senior leadership involvement, support from   managers and supervisors, and disciplined execution processes&#8221; are in place,   high-performing companies are much more committed to these program pillars. </span></em></strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.5in"><strong><em><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: black">Increasing accountability. High-performing companies   design their programs to make the true costs of care visible to employees,   and hold them accountable for the decisions they make at the point of care   using, for example, coinsurance rather than co-pays to share costs with   employees </span></em></strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.5in"><strong><em><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: black">Engaging employees. High-performing companies require   employees to be more accountable for their decisions, and take steps to help   employees do that by expanding communication initiatives and providing a   variety of tools and resources to support employee awareness, understanding   and action. </span></em></strong></p>
<p style="margin-left: 0.5in"><strong><em><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: black">Building a culture of health. High performers are much   more likely to say they&#8217;re committed to building a culture of health in their   organizations and to report that their employee education efforts are   succeeding. For example, a strong majority of the high performers say   employees accept their roles and responsibilities under their health plan,   are comfortable with the level of risk under the plan, and understand and use   decision support tools. </span></em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: black">&#8220;What   the high performers show us is that accountability swings both ways,&#8221;   said Guilmette.</span></em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: black">As   companies ask their employees to become more accountable for their health   care consumption and participate in cost-control initiatives, &#8220;the   companies themselves must become more accountable to employees by providing   the resources, support tools, education and communication initiatives that   employees need to be successful consumers of health care,&#8221; he advised.</span></em></strong></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">Retiree Health Trends</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">The survey data indicate that organizations are taking a different view and exhibiting different commitment levels to programs for retirees. Less than half of the companies Towers Perrin surveyed (47 percent) currently subsidize retiree medical coverage for current or future retirees. (SHRM&#8217;s 2007 <strong><em>Benefit Survey Report</em></strong> showed that 35 percent of SHRM members provide retiree health benefits, although 53 percent of large employers did so.)</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">Of those that are continuing a subsidy, the share they are asking retirees to provide is rapidly increasing, Towers Perrin found, particularly for retirees under age 65. In 2008:</span></p>
<ul>
<li><strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial; color: #003366">Retirees under age 65 </span></strong><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">will pay, on average, $3,324, an 8 percent increase.<strong></strong></span></li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li><strong>Retirees over 65</strong> will pay, on average, $1,500, a 5 percent increase.</li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Arial">The long-term effect of cost shifting to retirees could be to encourage older workers who want to leave the workforce to stay in their jobs primarily to receive company-subsidized health care, the report predicts.</span></p>
<!-- sphereit end --><span style="margin-bottom:40px; border-bottom:none;"><a href="http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://www.charlesakrugel.com/business-management/2008-projected-employer-health-care-costs.html"class="iconsphere" title="Sphere: Related Content" onclick="return Sphere.Widget.search('http://www.charlesakrugel.com/business-management/2008-projected-employer-health-care-costs.html')"   target="_blank">Sphere: Related Content</a></span><br/><br/><p><a href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save"  target="_blank" class="extlink" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.charlesakrugel.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.charlesakrugel.com/business-management/2008-projected-employer-health-care-costs.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benefit Plan Assessment Tool</title>
		<link>http://www.charlesakrugel.com/employee-benefits/benefit-plan-assessment-tool.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.charlesakrugel.com/employee-benefits/benefit-plan-assessment-tool.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 12:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Benefit Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employee Benefits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charlesakrugel.com/employee-benefits/benefit-plan-assessment-tool.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Shaheen, Vice President of The Horton Group (an insurance broker that provides risk management and employee benefits to businesses of all sizes), provided me with a copy of their employer benefits survey. It provides an interesting overview concerning what businesses should consider when choosing benefits plans. The following is a selection of topics from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- sphereit start --><p><a href="http://www.thehortongroup.com/about/employee-detail.asp?directory-id=119493405"title="Paul Shaheen's Bio"  target="_blank" class="extlink" target="_blank">Paul Shaheen</a>, Vice President of <a href="http://www.thehortongroup.com/" class="extlink" target="_blank">The Horton Group</a> (an insurance broker that provides risk management and employee benefits to businesses of all sizes), provided me with a copy of their employer benefits survey. It provides an interesting overview concerning what businesses should consider when choosing benefits plans.</p>
<p>The following is a selection of topics from the survey which a business should examine prior to choosing an employee benefits plan.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like a copy of the complete survey in PDF format, please don&#8217;t hesitate to <a href="http://www.charlesakrugel.com/contact">contact me</a>.</p>
<p><span id="more-76"></span></p>
<p><strong>Assessment &amp; Review</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Do you have a formal process to survey employees annually for feedback and rate their satisfaction with the plan?</li>
<li>Is your plan aligned with your company&#8217;s business plan?</li>
<li>Have you implemented or reviewed alternate funding options, such as transplants or specialty pharmacy?</li>
<li>Have you forecasted the current cost over the next five years?</li>
<li>Have you defined your benefit philosophy?</li>
<li>Have you benchmarked your cost sharing with employees against industry averages?</li>
<li>Does your plan maintain 75% or greater employee participation after valid waivers?</li>
<li>Have you benchmarked your plan rates against industry averages?</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Your Plan Design</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Do you offer more than one plan design?</li>
<li>Is at least one plan consumer directed?</li>
<li>Do you allow for employee pre-tax premium contributions?</li>
<li>Do you have a separate program for retirees?</li>
<li>Do you have a voluntary Medicare migration strategy?</li>
<li>Does your plan include affordable options for low-wage earners?</li>
<li>Have you had more than 2 carriers in the last 5 years?</li>
<li>Do you provide an EAP with work/Family Program?</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Shopping Your Plan</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Are you aware of the carrier markets for your size and type of plan?</li>
<li>Have you shopped both brokers and direct benefits vendors?</li>
<li>Have you reviewed network alternatives, access, disruption and utilization?</li>
<li>Does your contract include network discount guarantees?</li>
<li>Does your plan include a proactive out-reach disease management program?</li>
<li>Has your pharmacy benefit manager shown you all fees and rebates for your plan?</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Is Your Plan Legal?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Have you sent out Medicare Part D certificates to eligible participants and dependents?</li>
<li>Have you audited your 5500 process?</li>
<li>Do you outsource or have a tool to manage COBRA?</li>
<li>Do you outsource or have a tool to manage FMLA?</li>
<li>Do you receive legislative/Compliance updates monthly?</li>
<li>Have you contained Personal Health Information to a Privacy Officer?</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Communication/Administration Tools</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Do you track hits on your benefit website for employee/spouse?</li>
<li>Do you annually update employee beneficiary elections?</li>
<li>Do you provide a HIPAA compliant resource for escalated claim assistance?</li>
<li>Do you provide tools for new hire and spouse to review options with guidance on how to make best use of the program?</li>
<li>Does your HR unit operate in a paperless environment for open enrollment, life events, monthly adds and terms?</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Proactive Wellness</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Does your plan cover an annual adult physical?</li>
<li>Do you use incentives to drive participation in wellness activities?</li>
<li>Do you hold an Annual Benefits and Wellness Fair?</li>
<li>Do you use a Health Risk Appraisal and aggregate the data?</li>
<li>Does senior management play a role in your wellness activities?</li>
<li>Do you have a wellness committee working from a written business plan?</li>
<li>Do you offer professional coaching assistance to employees at risk and/or wanting to improve?</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Employee Education</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Do you use benefit statements to share the full benefit cost?</li>
<li>Do you conduct annual open enrollment meetings?</li>
<li>Do you offer lunch-and-team sessions on relevant topics?</li>
<li>Do the employees / dependents know all the resources offered by your carriers and how and when to use them?</li>
<li>Does your communication campaign reach spouses?</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Claims Review</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Do you know the loss ratio for your plan?</li>
<li>Do you annually benchmark utilization?</li>
<li>Do you perform a claims audit on your carrier or third party administrator?</li>
<li>Do you drill down into your claims to determine root causes?</li>
<li>Do you review prognosis, diagnosis, and cost of large claims?</li>
<li>Does your group use 90% in-network providers?</li>
<li>Do you track the number of inpatient admissions with cost and average stay?</li>
</ul>
<!-- sphereit end --><span style="margin-bottom:40px; border-bottom:none;"><a href="http://www.sphere.com/search?q=sphereit:http://www.charlesakrugel.com/employee-benefits/benefit-plan-assessment-tool.html"class="iconsphere" title="Sphere: Related Content" onclick="return Sphere.Widget.search('http://www.charlesakrugel.com/employee-benefits/benefit-plan-assessment-tool.html')"   target="_blank">Sphere: Related Content</a></span><br/><br/><p><a href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save"  target="_blank" class="extlink" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.charlesakrugel.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.charlesakrugel.com/employee-benefits/benefit-plan-assessment-tool.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
